JOURNAL
OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
REVIEWERS ASSESSMENT FORM
Manuscript No:………………………………………………………………………
Manuscript Title:…………………………………………...................…………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………
Please use the following guidelines to
evaluate the manuscript attached to this form.
1.
Is the title in consonance with
the contents of the manuscript?
Yes …………………………… No……………………………………
2.
Is the abstract a correct
summary of the study?
Yes …………………………… No……………………………………
3.
If no, highlight issues not discussed
or those that should be deleted.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………........................
4.
Is the sampling procedure
appropriate in attaining the study’s objective/hypothesis?
5.
Are the variables of the study
adequately measured?
Yes …………………………… No……………………………………
If No, comment on the weakness.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
6.
Are the statistical tests
appropriate for the study’s hypotheses/objectives?
Yes …………………………… No……………………………………
7.
If No, suggest appropriate
statistical test(s)
8.
………………………………………………………………………………………
9.
Have data been interpreted
correctly?
Yes …………………………… No……………………………………
10.
If No, identify incorrectly
interpreted data
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
11.
Are the conclusions, justifiable
from data?
Yes …………………………… No……………………………………
12.
Has the study made any
meaningful contribution to knowledge?
Yes …………………………… No……………………………………
13.
Are the references relevant and
up-to-date?
Yes …………………………… No……………………………………
14.
Are all the references cited in
the text?
Yes …………………………… No……………………………………
15.
If No, please list those not
cited
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
16.
Do names and dates of
references agree in both text and the final list?
Yes …………………………… No……………………………………
17.
Are the tables relevant?
Yes …………………………… No……………………………………
18.
If No, specify the irrelevant
tables.
…………………………………………………………………………………………….
19.
Are all the figures relevant?
Yes …………………………… No……………………………………
20.
If No, specify the irrelevant
figures.
…………………………………………………………………………………………….
21.
Are the titles of tables and
figures appropriate?
Yes …………………………… No……………………………………
22.
If No, suggest changes on
manuscript(s).
23.
Other comments.
………………………………………………………………………………………
24.
Overall Assessment
I recommend that the manuscript should be: (Tick only
one)
* Accepted for publication in its present
form…………………………………..
* Accepted for publication after minor
revision………………………………...
*Reconsidered for publication after major revision
…………………………….
*Rejected………………………………………………………………………...
Date of review…………………………………………………………....................
No comments:
Post a Comment